The form is the body of the color,
The color is the soul of the form.

Sigfrid A. Forsius (1611)


The problem of star colors is an interesting one. Much has been written about star color, and very likely, much will be written about it in the future. During the 1800s observations and theories about the nature of star colors were adopted with great interest and real fuvor. Without having the advantage of astronomical spectroscopy, little was then known about stellar temperatures and its relationship to color. Some careful and astute observations, some general information could be obtained. However, much of it today could be discarded as either irrelevant or unimportant. Sadly today, there still continues to be many poor and inaccurate views about star colors - some which have persisted for now by more than one-hundred years. Another of the worst aspects that have been adopted are the very many color descriptors that are used. It remains a little hard to understand how commonly expressed border-line colors like gold, crimson, lilac, grey or ashy can be readily described by visual observers for star colors

Some will often innocently exaggerate the colors they see and want to present more exotic colors to make them seem either original or accepted in the amateur astronomical community. Few may be viewed as faux pas, but many do still appear in articles throughut the popular astronomical press.

In my own opinion, several of them can only be described as new-age charlatans” by claiming either personal superior color vision based on the whimsical notion of the observer being the better sex or in having better color perception. I have even seen star colors seriously presented as apricot, peach, amber, silver-white, lemon-brown, beige, khaki, or even turquoise! These were even mixed with so-called reflectance terms like gloss, translucency or shadowy. Such descriptions are just pure and utter nonsense because they are visual colors, which verbally have arbitrary meanings - meanings that convey nothing at all to another person and are only useful to the individual that gave them. Worst with these observers is that the colors they are describing are physiologically impossible to see at night. The reasoning are all highly rich saturated colors (something we will argue for and discuss in depth with this very webpage) or are odd mixtures with the tones of black and/or white - something that is not seen in the continuous spectra of stars. In my own opinion, these types of amateur observers should be discredited immediately because they give poor representation of the many good, sensible and dedicated amateur astronomers.

Perhaps here Im being a bit too critical, but I only wish to highlight that using only more an specific simpler colors are far more useful than to try to match precisely what shade of coloration one particular star or double star system appears to be.

Much of the mechanism about color vision unfortunately does not work as well at low illuminations, which is the major limitation for visual observers. The main flaws lie with the cones in the retina of the eye that gains nearly all of the light needed for interpreting color. It seems the human eye for all its true biological wonder was just never designed for good night vision. This is bad news for the amateur astronomer who is trying to percieve fainter objects and to see color or spectral-based phenomena. Worst, there is no doubt that an observers age is likely another main cause for the eventual loss of the ability to interpret the spectral range. More unfortunate is that the younger the individual, the less able they can describe the visual colors they see just through lack of experience! Yet the real experts in recent times about eye color perception have been made by several French visual observers, with several interesting papers in the last twenty to thirty years or so. For example, I have presented the translated version by Paul Biaze written in the 1980s which is quite analytical and very innovative. A further excellent summary of this subject about star color appears in David Malins colors of the Galaxies (1996), which is recommended reading for all amateur observers.

Overall, the study of color perception for stars is still incomplete. This general article is about the cause of colors that we see in telescopes and why they are so hard to observe. It was also written to counteract the seeming avalanche of several new double star observers who have been claiming that they have some superior vision or better color perception. Please, if you are one of those observers that believe what I am saying here is wrong, then I suggest you reading the next four paragraphs very carefully before reading the rest of the text.


At the telescope any observed color is more often than not fairly poor. This indisputably is a physiological problem, as the human eye at night cause the loss of color vision. The important mechanism of our vision lies with the so-called rods and cones attached over the human retina. Each eye contains an average 137 million light-sensitive cells with the mean density of 650 per square millimeter. These are approximately ratioed as 617 black and white rods with only 33 being the color cones. About 7 million of the total are cone cells, whose average density are divided into thirds - equally being divided as either red, blue or green-sensitive.

There is no known difference in the number of rods or cones between males and females.

Rods are designed to measure the intensity of light in the eye (greyness) and respond very little to color. As light intensities vary so much, ranging from full sunlight to the near pitch-blackness of night, the need for such a mechanism is obvious. It also affords the detection of contrast. An analogy of this is similar to the controls of black and white televisions. The rods” will work regardless of the intensity of light.

Cones are the color receptors, and as their names suggest, are in the shape of a cone whose diameters reduce almost to points. For this reason they are poor light receptors, but with enough illumination, the wavelengths coming into to eye can be separated in to their component colors. The signals are then sent along the optic nerve of the brain and interpreted as color. The details on how our eyes do this is probably unnecessary to describe for the general reader. Needless to say, the understanding of the cause is chemically very complex, relying on many reactions and processes.

For all visual observers much of the star and deep-sky colors are lost to our eyes during the night. The simple reason is that cones have known thresholds for color sensitivity, and below particular light energies (flux) they almost all completely cease to function. Consequently, when we look at our general surrounds during the night, we see only a slight range of greyness”. Looking through any telescope, we are immediately exposed to the wide field illumination of the field stars and the astronomical object(s) in question. Most stars just appear white in color, but in some circumstances, like the very blue or very red stars, we do begin to see some distinct color. Also the fainter the star or object the less color we see are able to see. Hence, color is also magnitude dependant.

Star colors that we see are quite different from what we mostly see during our everyday living because at night we perceive very few hues. This is due to the color component known as saturation that can be described as the degree of whiteness in any perceived color. Importantly, saturation is fairly weak in all stars. For many astronomical objects these will produce only pale or washed-out colors and never intense ones. The only true exception is probably the deep-red carbon stars which have little blue or yellow light contributing to their spectra and appearance. Such stars are unusual and rare.

Seeing colors at night with is unusual because we can see no more than about 10% Saturation.

Experience finds that the more intense colors simply cannot be observed. The amount of saturation varies slightly between different individuals, and is visually dependant on the background color it is seen against.

color Saturation

Figure 1. Variation of Color Saturation

The color able here shows the colors red, orange, yellow, light blue and deep blue. color saturations above 10% are never seen in stars or nebulae. 0% color saturation is the pure white. All 100% saturation colors are often termed as pure colors.

color Contrast

Figure 2. Effects of the Background on Visual Perceived Color

The following figure shows the effect on 20% saturated colors seen against either black or white backgrounds. Each color against each its alterative background are identical, but visually our eyes see that those against the lighter background make the inside circles color seem to be slightly darker. This is caused by the color contrast as seen by the eye and is comparable to looking at the stars. For example, seeing stars during the hours of darkness when compared to seeing stars against the background of either twilight or daylight times. Similarly, pairs with quite different surface temperatures finds similar visual effects, which enhances the visual color differences. Amateur observers should also note that as the magnification is increased by using different eyepieces that background field is seen as slightly darker and this has an effect of changing the observed color slightly.

Any real need for estimating color in telescopes is likely not very important for most visual observers, but for those engaged in writing astronomical descriptions or promoting astronomy. Such color reports are both interesting and important to advise, whose knowledge may guide other deep-sky observers and amateurs to attractive targets.

How Much Reality is There in Seeing Star Colors at Night?

Based on the experiments by the visual physiologist Denis Baylor in 1978, it is possible to conclusively dismissed the ecumenical misconceived notions of color discrimination through the telescope. (See References) These original detailed experiments were conducted at the Department of Neurobiology at Stanford University whose aim was specifically to measured the eyes photon response in darkness. Attaching a photometer to individual rod and cone cells in the human retinas, he then measured photoelectrically the response of the photons of various monochromatic colors. After analysing the results, his main conclusion found that at low illumination, all the cone cells switch off, and nearly ceasing their entire electrical function. It is for this reason that the loss of color vision at night was explained and the first time quantatively determined. Baylor further says about his results;

This state of affairs makes it impossible for one cell, either a rod or cone, to signal separately wavelength and intensity. Consider a single rod upon which falls 100 photons of 550nm wavelength. These photons will be absorbed with the probability of say 10%, so that a total of ten absorptions will occur. Ten absorptions would also occur if 1000 photons were incident at 600nm. A particular wavelength therefore has the mean probability of absorption of only 10%. Since the cell reports only the number of photons absorbed, the signals generated by the two colored lights are identical, even though their wavelengths are different. Hence no color (wavelength) information is available. This explains why in starlight, where only the rods contribute to vision, we have no color sensation.

From this we can conclude as the rods receive the light, then our brains then try to interpret the colors it is seeing. Furthermore, as the star colors are never saturated, so what we generally see is only slight variations in hues.


One of the first important color scheme in stars was first made in 1901 by the variable star astronomer and editor of the Astronomical Journal Seth C. Chandler (1846-1913) (Chandler Scale - CI) producing seven basic colors. The southern double star observer R.T.A. Innes (1861-1933) was one of Chandlers greatest critics stating that he placed little credence in knowing star colors as they could be equally obtained photographically using two films or by instrumentally by photometry. I could not find any information relating to whether Hagen accessed Chandlers work, but personally I see much usefulness in Chandlers Scheme because I can easily distinguish these colors in the telescope and I assume the same for the majority of people !

It was Rev. John G. Hagen (1847-1930), who incidentally specialised in eclipsing binaries and produced the famous Atlas Stellarum Variabilium between 1899 and 1908, that was to produce a new logical color scale during 1924. This scale essentially was the later version of the previous and poorly adopted Chandler Index. Now known as the Hagen Color Index (HCI), the labelled star colors ranging between the values of -3 for Blue and +10 for Red with 0.0 corresponding to the B-V value of 0.0. This particular color scheme has remained the nomenclature now often adopted by amateurs who do variable star observations or for the measurements of pairs.

colors in this scheme were Blue, Bluish, White, Yellowish, Yellow, Orange and Red. Hagen simply just adds additional color values for these seven basic color elements.


-3 Pure Blue
-2 Pale Blue (Bluish)
-1 Blue / White
0 Pure White
1 Yellowish/white
2 Pale Yellow (Yellowish)
3 Pure Yellow
4 Orange /Yellow
5 Yellow / Orange
6 Pure Orange
7 Reddish / Orange
8 Orangey / Red
9 Red / Orange
10 Pure Red

Most visual observers tended to use the Hagen Color Index (HCI) which relates closely to stellar surface temperatures and the B-V color Index. No one truly adapted this as an analytical” method, but as an extra means of determining the correct” position angle of both the stars, especially when the magnitudes are nearly equal.

Note: The original observers designation overrides the estimation of the brightest against the faintest star. This means the designation of A and B components are preset by the discoverer. The HCI has some analytical basis, however, the linearity with visual divisions in quite poor. I.e. The values of say white to yellowish are different from say from blue to bluish or red to reddish.

HCI color Index

Figure 3. The Hagen Color Index (HCI) - 10% and 20% Saturation

Figure 3 shows the Hagen color Index Scale with both 10% Saturation, the likely maximum visible color, and 20% Saturation. I have contrasted the colors against both black or white backgrounds so the visibility of the colors and the contrast effects can be seen. The Figure above clearly shows these differences. All observed colors will be also slightly different when they are pinpoints, and the color presented here are closer to the defocussed star images that can be seen in the telescope. Observers should note that I have calculated the colors to be approximately 10% and then I have had to make several small adjustments so that the colors look a bit more consistent. However this changes are quite likely inconsequential for many visual observers. Most stars will be fainter than the colors presented here and nearly all of the fainter stars will have almost insignificant saturations.

Anyone using the colors for observational comparison should ONLY use the 10% SATURATION SCALE.

It was M. Minnaert who first discussed star colors in more modern terms. If we assume that star colors are based on the black body properties of objects, as seen in a ultra-hot furnace (I.e. The famous simple experiment it to heat a small piece of metal (like Tungsten) where, as the temperature rises, the metal is colored from red-hot, yellow-hot, white-hot then blue-hot.) we will find this will follow the observed spectral sequence and B-V color index - but without green.

Minnaert then adopted the series of eight separate color groups he could distinguish by eye. He then did a simply blind experiment by comparing his color estimates against the B-V color index, which proved to have a high correlation. From this, he then first achieved the feat of distinguish the spectral class letter of the object. Minnaert gained much kudos for this achievement in his day !

Minnaert also investigated the color of the white and yellow stars, finding that they could distinguish the yellow ones into white-yellow, light yellow, pure yellow and deep yellow. (The reason for this, I think, is that the eye is more sensitive to seeing this part of the spectrum, especially when compared with the red, and the far blue.) Interestingly, his experiments validates the problems of color saturation. His book concludes that only eight major or primary star colors each corresponding to the mid-spectral classes of O, B, A, F, G, K, M, S.

Spectral Classification

Figure 4. Colors of the Spectral Classification - 10% Saturation

Figure 4 shows the colors of the Spectral Classification at 10% Saturation. The colors can be estimated in the telescope with care, but observers should note that these are the maximum colors and most of the stars have much lower saturated colors. I have contrasted the colors against both black or white backgrounds so the visibility of the colors. The colors here are suitable for using in drawings of star charts where the spectral class is required.

Again, anyone using the colors for observational comparison should ONLY use this 10% SATURATION SCALE.

According to David Malin (AAO), it was the astronomer Leslie Morrison from the Royal Greenwich Observatory who attempted visual observation of stars through the transit telescope, and doing a blind test, could guess the Spectral Class of the star in question! Each class could be seen and ascertained with the eye, with each have only three or four shades of certain colors, with the solitary non-color” of white. The fourteen valid” colors in this second system were (in order);


Deep blue
Light blue
White White-yellow
Light yellow
Pure yellow
Deep yellow
Light orange
Deep orange
Light red
Deep red


Star colors HCI and Spectral Class

For double star observers such methodologies have been already established using scales like the Hagen Color Index (HCI). This scale has values between -3 and +10, describing the possible range of fourteen double star colors - from blue to white to yellow to orange to red. This roughly mimics the range seen in astronomical spectra, the temperature of the star and the spectral classes. However the problems for double stars that use this particular index, finds the fundamental inherent weakness is a scale is that it does not differentiate between the different color saturations. Furthermore it takes no account of the stellar magnitude. Although this scale is quite arbitrary between observers, different eyes will certainly see different colors. Unfortunately, the HCI system leaves too large a range of observable possibilities for the many different colors. Moreover, detecting color is also very observationally difficult to see as the stars more often than not appear simply as point sources. Often by just simply defocussing the stars into small plate-like disks can be applied to partly exacerbate this problem.

When reading older books, texts and catalogues, you will find more often that they not use the following abbreviations W hite, B lue, Y ellow, O range, P urple, R ed, G reen, C grey, L ilac, A gold, S ashy. With the following additions: p ale - or d eep and the tendency towards any color - sh. So as an example, a yellow star with the color not convincing - Ysh (Yellowish) or Bsh (Bluish).

A further usefulness for this color scheme is that the observer can quickly write down these abbreviations in his or her observation notes. Although the use of color is likely not important, but it is an additional descriptor when checking the pair at a later date or reducing observations.

Later use of the abbreviations now tend to favor the Hagen color Index (HCI), which relates closely to stellar surface temperatures. Using this index, visual observers should report as e.g. -2 / 3”, being its pale blue primary and pure yellow secondary. Other additional colors were added later I.e. -0.5 for grey and -0.25 for green.

Figure 5. ⇒ (On the Right-hand Side)
gives the approximate look of the vast majority of star colors in the telescope. This is based on 10% color Saturation given earlier in the text.

A. The White Box on the lefthand side of the Figure shows the Hagen color Index Number, the approximate observed apparent color and the Spectral Class it pertains too.

B. The White Box on the righthand side (at the top) is the reported colors sometimes seen by observers. I have labelled this as due to Contrast Effects because more often than not they are only seen in visual double stars.

C. The White Box on the righthand side (at the bottom) gives the pure monochromatic colors as they would be seen in a telescope. These of course do not exist in Nature and are given as comparison.


If the color is a definite color, report it as eg."White" or "Blue" etc.
If the color seems a definite tint, report it as eg. "Yellowish" or "Bluish" etc.
If it seems either like a combination or range of colors report it as "Bluish" or "Bluish-White" etc.
If the color can not be described, record it as "Unusual" or "colorless"
If the primarys color is seen but not the secondary, record it as "Blue / - " etc.


Interesting discussions often appear every now and then regarding the observation of green stars. This is especially prevalent in the observations during the 18th Century, relevant to observers like Admiral Smyth or Rev. T.W. Webb. In my view, the only star that I have really seen to display green was the companion to Antares / α Scorpii, which I thought was really closer to blue than green.

The challenge about the true existence of green stars was likely first eliminated by M. Minnaert Light and color in the open air.” Dover Publications (1954). If the color green is real in stars, then I would suspect that might be caused by an optical defect of the telescope combined with effects of the eye. An similar example of this effect is what that occurs with visual observations of the planet Mars. For example, Raffaello Braga from the 33-doubles e-group (33-doubles@eGroups.com) told that the;

...companion of Pulcherrima (Epsilon Bootis) has been sometimes described as green. This is surely a color caused by color contrast that may be perceived when stars are observed with obstructed telescopes, as they tend to diffuse light around the primary component...

He also reveals, that according to Flammarion, other green stars included the companions of;

...Zeta Lyr, Gamma Del and Alpha Her.

Another classical” green Example commonly described is often Alpha (2) Librae but, I know of no other far southern ones.

The only green I see in any astronomical body are associated with several planetaries and the brightest of the emission nebulae. I.e. The Eta Carinae Nebula (NGC 3372) in Carina or the Orion Nebula, and the outer planets of the Solar System Uranus and Neptune. This is either formed by ionic emission of O-III forbidden” light or by interaction of light by chemical compounds like Methane.

My main disagreement with the existence of green stars is that the temperature range of these objects falls in the white "A"-type stars where green doesnt appear in the spectrum of these stars. This is because all the other colors of the spectrum equally "swamp the light" like blue, yellow and red - hence the B-V color index value of 0.0 indicating no color excess.

The only possible way I can think possibly to producing green stars, being likely close visual binary stars that has both blue and yellow components in the magnitude ratio of about 2:3. Then, the combined visual color color would be certainly be green. However, I know no examples of such objects.
I once did a rough search of suitable eclipsing binaries and even some ellipsoidal systems (E-IIs), and found only a handful of examples that met the criteria. However, all were far too faint for proper visual color assessment.


I have read much about what is written about color, and have found some interesting ideas that are worthy for elaboration and clarification. Below is an adaptation of some of my own notes and essays on color, which I have slightly updated for relevance to astronomy and double stars.


One of the most interesting aspects is on the perception color and the alleged differences between the sexes. Much of this has been generated by the fable that women have some kind of superior vision and color perception. The modern scientific view has shown there are no significant differences between males and females in interpreting color. Most of the current literature also still confirms this view. Recently, colour scientists have shown that the main differences in colour perception between males and females to be more psychological rather than physiological ones. The reasoning follows that for women their mothers and peers from an early age train their daughters and young girls in color perception and color matching, especially after puberty. Subjects are deemed to have improved perception”, being merely based on their vastly larger and better color vocabulary and knowledge. Naturally women, who are faced with applying face make-up, soon know the subtleties of color and the match of cosmetics to achieve the desirable effects they want. This is also shown in the comparison or matching of many additional fashion accessories like shoes or handbags and with their own clothing.

Men in life are generally not faced with any degree of color matching, and psychologically often do not need or use such color terminology. Others in this field of study say the need for women having the color knowledge improves their attractiveness” to their male counterparts. Some have said that certain colors, like red, are more noticeable by males. (I.e. Males more often see red on females rather than on other males because they are more aggressive likely from increased use of adrenalin and the male hormone testosterone.) However, no physiological difference has ever been found to influence either the retinas rods and cones to account for this. Another likely possibility suggests that color may be someway affect by the individuals emotional state/p>

Again this is more likely an environmental difference. Another explanation maybe to do with brain chemistry and the interaction of with various compounds including hormones and adrenalin release. Though they have made some studies on such mechanisms our understanding on this subject remains quite incomplete. All eyes have the main chemical pigment known as 11-cis Retinal; the principle photo-receptors and photosensitive chemical component that is not too unlike the silver halide crystals used in photography, that measure the light intensity. The 11-cis Retinal in the reaction combines with specific proteins, called amino acid glutamates, which then become the color chemical interpreters” for the photo-receptors. The human brain has acquired these latter proteins for color discrimination and is some cases the erroneous recombinations for the wrong interpretation of color in color defects.


The main problem with color perception between the sexes is with color blindness. It is found that the so-called anomalous trichromacy that limits 6% of mens color vision, meaning they are unable to properly discriminate the colors between red and green. Another 2% are so-called dichromats, and are deficient in the pigments needed for discrimination of the both the long and middle wavelengths. Men are also ten times more likely to have some form of color blindness defects than women. Most color blindness is cause by a defect in a specific gene that causes in the eye by either the red or green cones called protanopia, or the less frequently known blue cone defect known as deuteranopia.

Overall, visual color problems are caused in the incorrect usage of the chemical pigments. In simpler terms, it works like a television where the color gun is working incorrectly and, not targeting properly or even has one gun is not functioning at all. I.e. Take out the red component so the colors that are seen are mainly yellows, blues and greens etc.

Total Color Blindness occurs in 1:40 000 individuals, equally between men and women, where the cones do not form from birth. Such persons are sensitive to high intensity light, and have vision that is akin to your surrounds as they appear during normal twilight vision. (Naturally without any color) Sometime others have no rods, and have to rely on their cone vision. These individuals are night-blind” are medically termed hemeralopes.

Another more general fault is that the spectral range of the visual wavelengths narrows as you age. The cause for this is likely that the rod and cones reduces in number combined with increasing inefficiencies in the chemical signals being sent to the brain. Although the visible impact is minute during the daylight hours because there is overwhelmingly sufficient amount of light, the effects become far more pronounced when less photons are available. I.e. If the color degradation were 25%, for example, and then say some million photons were received in one second of time during daylight hours, the loss of light would be of little consequence as there is enough light available for color discrimination. Yet if a hundred photons were received over the same period the effect would be more dramatic and obvious. To our eyes, this manifests in the gradual loss color so that the sky would becomes more greyish”. (Note that if this postulate is true, this would have slightly more trouble discerning nebulosity in the telescope as we got older.)

A secondary effect is that the range of observed colors also diminish such that the ability to see blues and reds at either ends of the visible spectrum becomes harder to see. As our eyes as sensitive to red, then you should find that the perceived blues intensity gradually gets slightly lesser over time. This combined with the decreasing light intensity will find that colors become less obvious. I suspect that the age where these effects start happens at an average age of about fifty-years old. (See Figure 6)

color Contrast

Figure 6. color Loss With Age

Figure 6 shows the expected explanation for most of the loss of color vision as we age. Although arguably subjective, it does explain what is happening regarding the general discussions about color perception with people of various ages. It is important to note that some people may experience no loss of color at all while others may find the changes and differences suddenly and quite dramatic. Again there is no real better” or worst” in this situation and certainly no superior color vision.


Still unexplained in nature is why color-vision in humans are similar between the sexes, but is much more different than the many other color-visioned mammals. I.e. Apes and monkeys have known significant differences in color perception between males and females. Typically, these primates have males with two types of color cones dichromats while the females do have three different color cones or trichromats. The postulated reason for this has been something to do with either behavior modification or being necessary for mate selection. [Some religious discussions have used these particular facts against Charles Darwins Theory of Evolution”.]

Note: Only 2% of all human males are dichromats - being probably the genetic eye defects from misaligned X-chromosomes.

The chemical proteins for the colored-cone photo-receptors are attached to the XX and XY. Interestingly women have a duplication of these cone receptors while males do not. This explains the increased number of males that have imperfect genetically color vision. However this does NOT mean that females have, as some submissions I have read have claimed, of better or improved” vision, as the chemical and physical mechanisms are just the same. In evolutionary terms, our eyesight maybe one of the earliest to develop especially as keenness of sight has definite advantages for hunting animals or spear fishing for food.

color genetic defects in women may mean they can be so-called tetrachromatic, which are likely women who have had sons who are dichromats”. (Jordan, G., Mollon, J.D. A study of women heterozygous for color deficiencies.”, Vision Research, 33, 1495-1508 (1993)) Here, they mismatch the colors, and they have slightly better capabilities in separating red to orange colors. However, such women are literally one-in-a-million.


1. Malin, David; The Colors of the Galaxies”, Pub. Cambridge University (1996)
2. color, Art and Science.” Ed. Trevor Lamb and Janine Bourriau, Cambridge University Press. (1995)

a. Baylor, Denis; Color Mechanisms of the Eye”;
b. Millon, John; Seeing Color”
c. Lyons, John; Color in Language”

3. Gerstner, K.;The Forms of Color - The Interaction of Visual Elements.”; MIT Press (1986)


I would like to sincerely thank Tom Teague, Luis Arguelles, Eddy OConner and Raffaello Braga for their poignant views and for being the true inspiration for this text on this page. However, Richard Harshaw deserves special credit for some really interesting ideas and innovative solutions regarding the colors seen in doubles. One or two ideas by Richard have show pure genius and have forced me to again question for some time on how to apply these to stellar observations.
Note: All of the above are members of the unique 33-doubles Yahoo! Group.


1. The definitions of the primary parameters of color are hue, saturation and brightness. This is where hue is the dominant - just as Wiens law dictates for the observed colors of stars. In brief the definitions are;

Hue is the discernable color based on the dependant dominate wavelength, independant saturation or brightness.

Saturation is the observed degree of whiteness added to the color.

Brightness is the observed intensity of the visible light from a source.

2. The subject of color and its nature is known in science of physics as Radiometry, and is specifically about the measurement of electromagnetic radiation and light - including the visible portion of the spectrum. Such measurements, especially in astronomy, are made using photometry, which measures and expressses light in terms of radiation units, like energy (in SI units of Watts), and radiance and irradiance - being power (watts) per unit area (I.e. SI units of square meter (m2 or in units of solid angles, steradians (sr).
UNITS : Brightness is measured in the SI units known as lux (lx), as the numbers of lumens per square meter, which in astronomical terms is about 0.25 lux for Full Moon, 1 mlx (milli-lux) for dark moonless night sky, 50 to 80μlx for general starlight.
The unit of lumens (lm) is more complicated, being the amount of light (number of photons) emitted by a uniform source of one candela, that is spread over the solid angle of one steradian (sr)
The SI unit of candela (cd) is also a measure of luminosity intersity of some monocromatic light source (single color). Few astronomical sources are known to be monochromatic.

3. The title of much of the earlier section on green stars I have updated, which appeared in the 33-doubles e-group entitled Its Not Easy Being Green”.

I commented ; In regards the color Green, perhaps Kermit the Frog is the only being, in this world, who sees these green colored stars with certainty? (Hence the title...)

4. I been thinking of proposing an experiment using a series of stars in increasing Right Ascension, in which the observer has to estimate the colors, and this is later correlated with the B-V values. This will give an estimate of the observers ability to see colors, and even shades of those colors. It would also test the color acuity of the observer, objectively. Would anyone be interested in such a visual experiment?

5. I have some Double Star Color Estimate results of the seventy-two stars observed by some thirty-two (32) amateurs of the Astronomical Society of New South Wales and other nearby Australian astronomical Societys. We conducted these, equally among a few northern and many southern pairs. (See Page029d.htm)

6. Luis Arguelles (33-Doubles Communication) commenting on this suggests;

...as commented by other members of the list, probably it was caused from different cultural roles between males and females. I also think its more a question of brain processing than the number of cells in our retinas.

7. Ric Hill (33-Doubles Communication Message 835: 05th April 2000), was the one who inspired some of the text above. However, there is absolutely no evidence to support his quote below;

Yes, I remember reading that during WW II a study was conducted by DOD, to determine which were better suited for night watch duty. I cant remember the source, possibly Science News but if it was then it was from the early 1990s, or maybe the late 1980s. Basically, it found that women see color at a lower light level than men but men can see in an overall lower light level than women but its all black and white to us. So if you want to see faint galaxies, be a guy. But if you want to see color in the Orion Nebula, be a gal. Sorry bout that folks, nature is sexist.

8. I have studied chemistry and worked for a biscuit company for some sixteen years before leaving several years ago. During 1989, one of my projects was to the set-up for the instrumental measurement of the color of baked biscuits. I was already fairly interested in colorimetry sometime before this, and actually once did a specific course on color including color matching and design. Yet of the seventeen in the class I was the only male, mainly because they designed the course for textiles, cosmetics and fashion. A small portion however was left under architectural design, which I enjoyed the most, but I unfortunately missed a few of these lectures. Much of the earlier work presented was on color measurement (colorimetry) and on the creation and nature of pigments. Once I completed the course, I am now considered a colorist, though over the years I have never called myself this. This is mainly because others have often interpreted the connotations of the title, by me presumably being able to improving there lives by advising matching certain colors to their personalities - the astrology of the colorist. This knowledge, however, has proved to have certain advantages especially with the opposite sex. I.e. Drumming up a conversation, but I have observed, despite my continued advice, most of them still take absolutely no notice! Furthermore, I still continue to wear the standard issue” black trousers with bright colored tops and jumpers - and never as the current and costly fashion dictates.

For a continunance of this page:
See Star Colors 2. (Next)


Last Update : 4th August 2012

Southern Astronomical Delights © (2010)

For any problems with this Website or Document please e-mail me.